1. Disuse of the Dual. The Greek of the LXX has two numbers, the singular and the plural. The dual, which was already falling into disuse in the time of Homer, and which is seldom adhered to systematically in classical writers, has disappeared altogether.
Contrast with the above —
. Plat. Rep. 470 B ἐπὶ δυοῖν τινοῖν διαφοραῖν. Isocr. Paneg. 55 c περὶ τοῖν πολέοιν τούτοιν.
2. Εἶς as Article. Under the influence of Hebrew idiom we find the numeral εἶς turning into an indefinite pronoun in the Greek of the LXX, as in
There are instances of the same usage in the two most Hebraistic books of the Ν.T.
Our own indefinite article ' a' or ' an' (Scotch ane) is originally the same as 'one.' We can also see the beginning of the French article in the colloquial language of the Latin comedians.
Ter. And. 118 forte unam aspicio adulescentulam. Plaut. Most. 990 unum vidi mortuum efferri foras.
Apart from the influence of Hebrew, εἷς is occasionally found in good Greek on the way to becoming an article. See L. & S. under
26 |
3. First Declension. In classical Greek there is a tendency for proper names, especially those of foreign origin, which end in the nominative in -α preceded by a consonant other than ρ, to retain the -α in the genitive, e.g. Λήδας, ᾽ΑFνδρομέδας, Κομλέγας (name of a Spanish town, App. VI De Reb. Hisp. 43). In pursuance of this analogy we have such, genitives as Βαλλας and ΖέΦας (Gen. 372), Σονσάννας (Sus. O30).
On the other hand, nouns in -α pure, or -α preceded by ρ, are in a few instances found in the LXX to take the Ionic form of the genitive and dative in -ης and -ῃ.
Ex. 821 κυνόμυιαν . . . κυνομυίης, 159 and Gen. 2740 τῃ̑ μαχαίρῃ.
i K. 2520 αὐτη̑ς ἐπιβεβηκυίης ἐπὶ τῂν ὄνον. ii Mac. 823, 1222 σπείρης
It is said that in the Papyri σπείρης is always used, never σπείρας.
The plural of γη̑ is found in the LXX.
Acc. γα̑ς iv K. 1835. Gen. γαιω̑ν iv K. 1835: Ps. 4811: Ezk. 3624: ii Esd. 91 and three other passages. Dat. γαι̑ς iv K. 1911. γαίαις Dan. 0' 1142.
4. Second Declension. θεός has a vocative θεέ. Dt. 324: Jdg. 213, 1628: Wisd. 91. Usually, however, the nominative is employed for the vocative, as in--
Ps. 211 ῾Ο Θεὸς ὁ Θεός μου πρόοχες μοι ‧ ἱνατί ἐγκατέλιές με;
But in Matthew 2746 this passage assumes the form--
Θεέ μου, Θεέ μου, ινατί με ἐγκατέλιπες;
The Attic form of this declension is of rare occurrence in the LXX. λαός and ναός are the regular forms. λέώς does not occur at all, and λέώς only in Second Maccabees. ἅλως is common: but for that there is no non-Attic form, as it does not arise, like the others, on the principle of transposition of quantity.
5. Third Declension. The word σκνίψ (Ex. 816) is interesting, as adding another instance of a noun-stem in -Φ to the rare word κατη̑λιψ and νίΦα, which occurs only in the accusative in Hes. Op. 533. Σκνίψ is also found in the LXX with stem σκνιπ-.
27 |
Calvin College. Last modified on 08/11/06. Contact the CCEL. |